Releases took weeks
Every change needed a manual test cycle, so small fixes waited for big release windows.
Cartly case study
Cartly partnered with TechXntra to design, build and launch a product that scales with their growth.
Cartly partnered with TechXntra to design, build and launch a product that scales with their growth. Every release was risky, costs kept rising, and the people who understood the original code had moved on. Standing still was no longer an option.
Every change needed a manual test cycle, so small fixes waited for big release windows.
Over-provisioned servers ran around the clock whether customers were active or not.
Tightly coupled modules meant one change could break three unrelated features.
Only two engineers understood the core flows, and documentation was years out of date.
What TechXntra did
Two weeks of interviews, analytics review and a prioritised roadmap.
Every module mapped with its dependencies and risk score.
A shared component library for web and mobile.
Clean, versioned APIs in front of the legacy core.
Records moved in batches with automatic reconciliation checks.
Automated builds, tests and zero-downtime deploys.
End-to-end tests on every critical customer journey.
Runbooks, training and a calm, staged go-live.
Discovery often uncovers more than the brief. Here the team found that what looked like one product was really three services sharing one database, and split them cleanly.
Every phase has a senior TechXntra engineer in the loop. They set the scope, review what the tools find, decide what needs a human answer, and turn it into a plan the client's team can trust.

What we delivered
Each release shipped behind a feature flag, was tested end to end, and could be rolled back in one click.
Example release note
Deploy 214 / checkout service / zero downtime / rollback ready / 0 errors
Small, reversible releases are why the client's team now ships every week without late-night incidents.
Rewrites fail when a forgotten rule shows up in production. We find those rules first, confirm them with the client, and only then build. Launch comes faster, with less risk.

The output
120K
Lines of code reviewed
640
Requirements documented
85
Automated test suites
7
Services extracted
0
Critical incidents at launch
Older codebases are easier targets every year. Fixing the basics early costs a fraction of fixing them after an incident.

Launch guarantee
Check 1
Before release
Journeys covered95%
Check 2
During launch
Parity confirmed100%
Before automation, these checks depended on long manual test cycles. A structured, automated approach is faster and catches more than a manual team usually does.
TechXntra maps legacy systems, explains what is really inside them and rebuilds them in small, safe steps, whatever the stack.